Securities Lawyers, Investor Fraud, and Securities Attorneys
Investment Fraud with IPOs, Stocks, Investments, Accounting Scams
Litigation NewsProtect your investments, Learn the Law, Understand Lawsuits
 
 
 
<< Previous    1...   98  99  [100]  101  102  ...105    Next >>

D. The legislation is unlikely to be effective.

If Congress were to pass S. 1260, it would create a strong incentive for institutional investors to bring their cases individually in state court when that is the more favorable venue. (19) Thus, companies still will face the threat of state court litigation for forward-looking statements. Furthermore, plaintiffs' attorneys may still be able to avoid the federal discovery stay by bringing a parallel individual case in state court. Investors, meanwhile, will have paid an enormous price for legislation that fails even to solve the "problems" Congress set out to address. Thus, when this new law also proves ineffective, will its proponents return to Congress with a request to preempt all private rights of action under state laws for exchange-traded securities? How big a sledgehammer is Congress willing to wield to kill this gnat?

<< Previous    1...   98  99  [100]  101  102  ...105    Next >>

 

Insider Trading Lawyer
Investor Complaint Lawyers
Anti Money Laundering Lawyer
Affinity Fraud Lawyer
Securities Lawsuits
Arbitration Lawyer Securities
Financial Privacy Lawyers
Securities Fraud Lawyers
Sarbanes Oxley
Investor Claims Lawyers
Financial Links
Financial Fraud
Securities Litigation
Investing Fraud and Lawyers
Investment Advisor Fraud Lawyer
IPO Lawyers Fraud
Financial Fraud and Disclosure Attorney Resources
Financial Statements Fraud
Micro Cap Stock Fraud Lawyer
IPO Fraud Initial Public Offering Lawyer
Financial Glossary Fraud
Site Map